Bernie Sanders Takes The Gloves Off To Protect Medicare

Read More At:

Clip from The Kyle Kulinski Show, which airs live on Blog Talk Radio and Secular Talk Radio Monday – Friday 11:00 AM – 12:30 PM Eastern time zone.

Listen to the Live Show or On Demand archive at:

Follow on Twitter:

Like on Facebook:

Friends Of SecularTalk:

AMAZON LINK:

Bernie Sanders Takes The Gloves Off To Protect Medicare

92 thoughts on “Bernie Sanders Takes The Gloves Off To Protect Medicare

    • w8stral2 lets all encourage a system where all wealth slowly trickle upwards to fewer and fewer people, so that if it goes on long enough, th world basicaly ends up with one owner of everything, that can looks at is bank statements while jerking off…

    • Ste H but thats the main issue with centrists they want the best for all including capitalists even though capitalists what stop at anything but total control over the economy and the world. you can’t balance capitalism and leftism its just impossible. when you try that what you get is reactionaries like trump taking over and this is exactly whats happening now. centrism is disingenuous to both the left and the right and it just doesn’t work.

    • +The Rune et al
      To fix the problem you do not destroy the system, you address the failures of the system and fix them. Namely what is compressing more power into fewer peoples hands.

      CEO’s, CFO’s, Board members of corporations are nothing but employees. Therefore all you have to do is demand that any corporation with manufacturing facilities or headquarters in the USA cannot pay their head bozos more than 10X the average wage of their full time employees.

      This nullifies the jack wipes from voting themselves immense insane wages when the common worker gets nothing, and likewise nullifies the moving of headquarters to say, the Caymen islands. Then enact tariffs as there is no such thing as “FREE trade” in this world. Well, there is, it is called trade inside a country with the same laws and regulations.

      Now If someone starts a PRIVATE company where they are liable for all debts, then they should be paid whatever they want as they are personally responsible for the debts of said business.

      Inheritance laws take care of the rest.

      PS. Break up the big banks and hedge funds into much much much smaller entities. That includes the gigantic federal and state pension plans that dump their Billions upon Billions into single entities creating monsters that outweigh private capital investment in many cases. This forces there to be multiple entities that compete and make decisions instead of only a few.

  1. The left is splintered and broken….and half of America has apparently been lobotomized. The barbarians are at the gates, and not only are they unguarded, but unlocked as well. Orwell was a prophet.

    • Jews throughout history have been expelled from well over 100 countries. The reason the jews declared war on Germany was because the Germans were fed up with the Jewish ownership of banks media and influence on their country. This is the exact same troubling characteristics we see in many countries today most recognizable in America. I will prove to you my comments and you will realize the truth and accuracy of my objective analysis. You will be one of very few to have it in his heart the truth and the sole duty to represent the people and inform them of the situation at hand.

    • Below I have provided you with the indisputable proof of the Jewish over representation in US Government and Politics.

      https://thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls-the-treasury-department/

      In the Treasury Department
      Of the twenty-six(26) U.S. Treasury Department senior officials, eighteen(18) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 69%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the U.S. Treasury Department senior officials by a factor of 34.5 times times(3,450 percent).

      In the Justice Department
      Of the forty-seven(47) U.S. Justice Department senior officials, twenty-two(22) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 47%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the U.S. Justice Department senior officials by a factor of 23.5 times(2,350 percent).

      Inside the Whitehouse
      Of the eleven(11) current and former senior advisors of President Barack Obama, nine(9) are Jews, partial Jews, or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 82%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the current and former senior advisors of President Barack Obama by a factor of 41 times(4,100 percent).

      In the Senate
      Of the twenty(20) U.S. Senate Committee chairmen, eight(8) are Jews or partial Jews. This is a numerical representation of 40%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the U.S. Senate Committee chairmen by a factor of 20 times(2,000 percent).

      In Congress
      Of the forty-two(42) U.S. House Committee chairmen and ranking members, six(6) are Jews or partial Jews. This is a numerical representation of 14%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the U.S. House Committee chairmen and ranking members by a factor of 7 times(700 percent).

      In the Supreme Court
      Of the nine(9) U.S. Supreme Court justices, four(4) are Jews or partial Jews. This is a numerical representation of 44%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the U.S. Supreme Court justices by a factor of 22 times(2,200 percent).

      In the State Department
      Of the seventy-four(74) U.S. State Department senior officials, forty(40) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 54%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the U.S. State Department senior officials by a factor of 27 times(2,700 percent).

      In the Defense Department
      Of the one-hundred eleven(111) U.S. Defense Department senior officials, forty(40) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 36%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the U.S. Defense Department senior officials by a factor of 18 times(1,800 percent)

      I encourage you to look into the other avenues the website offers.

    • In addition to such indisputable proof and the correlation of behaviour throughout history below I will present you the words from a Jewish Rabbi and you can see for yourself how they think and what’s on their mind.

    • Do not allow the petty approach of slander to deter you from this subject. There is a reason they need to resort to such childish tactics in the face of truth. The truth hurts and they cannot handle the truth.

    • +Communist Crapshoot​ You’re welcome for being an upstanding citizen man and providing you with a wealth of information to support my claims. Feel free to realize the facts are anti semitic.

    • +MasteR BlasteR How is a single senator out of 100 supposed to reform the entire healthcare system? Maybe think for a second about the system before you spout all of the “nothing” that Sanders has done.

    • +Logan Gantner hes been there for 40 years what has he done? Oh yeah nothing thats why you dont answer the question did i hurt your feelings do you need a safe space snowflake

    • whyamimrpink78 That’s a shitty counter-argument. The real solution is to stop people from getting sick through prevention, but the cancer insustry is worth too much to allow that to happen. Ideally, the perfect medical (and prison) systems seek to put themselves out of business through a lack of requirement for their services.

  2. We know who fights for us. Bernie seems to be one of the only politicians I’ve ever seen carry that weight. Let’s repay him by following his advice.

    • +Jason Bone went to Trump’s house, stole his nuke and nuked 900 of his businesses, punched his face, stole his wallet, and ran.

    • +Jordan Ross Don’t be dumb. I know full on Socialism doesn’t work, I just want some Socialist policies to protect us from capitalist predators.

    • Dear Dear Rusty Peghole, poor Runtsy, the reason for pointing out that it came into being under Obama, is that you denied it – and claimed instead that it was created in Bush’s time. You lose again. That’s why the time frame came up. LoserRusty.

    • David McCall still doesn’t have a clue. ISIS used to be ISI, and ISI used to be AQI. ISI and AQI formed back in 2004 and 2006, during the Bush administration.

      Dude, you have lost every single debate. Just give up already.

  3. All Trump wanted was respect from the actual rich.
    His conflicts of interest are bound to get him impeached sometime during his presidency.

    • xinic5 The Jews have been run out of every country in Europe.

      Date Place
      1. 250: Carthage
      2. 415: Alexandria
      3. 554: Diocese of Clement (France)
      4. 561: Diocese of Uzzes (France)
      5. 612: Visigoth Spain
      6. 642: Visigoth Empire
      7. 855: Italy
      8. 876: Sens
      9. 1012: Mayence
      10. 1181: France
      11. 1290: England
      12. 1306: France
      13. 1348: Switzerland
      14. 1349: Hielbronn (Germany)
      15. 1349: Hungary
      16. 1388: Strasbourg
      17. 1394: Germany
      18. 1394: France
      19. 1422: Austria
      20. 1424: Fribourg & Zurich
      21. 1426: Cologne
      22. 1432: Savory
      23. 1438: Mainz
      24. 1439: Augsburg
      25. 1446: Bavaria
      26. 1453: Franconis
      27. 1453: Breslau
      28. 1454: Wurzburg
      29. 1485: Vincenza (Italy)
      30. 1492: Spain
      31. 1495: Lithuania
      32. 1497: Portugal
      33. 1499: Germany
      34. 1514: Strasbourg
      35. 1519: Regensburg
      36. 1540: Naples
      37. 1542: Bohemia
      38. 1550: Genoa
      39. 1551: Bavaria
      40. 1555: Pesaro
      41. 1559: Austria
      42. 1561: Prague
      43. 1567: Wurzburg
      44. 1569: Papal States
      45. 1571: Brandenburg
      46. 1582: Netherlands
      47. 1593: Brandenburg, Austria
      48. 1597: Cremona, Pavia & Lodi
      49. 1614: Frankfort
      50. 1615: Worms
      51. 1619: Kiev
      52. 1649: Ukraine
      53. 1654: LittleRussia
      54. 1656: Lithuania
      55. 1669: Oran (North Africa)
      56. 1670: Vienna
      57. 1712: Sandomir
      58. 1727: Russia
      59. 1738: Wurtemburg
      60. 1740: LittleRussia
      61. 1744: Bohemia
      62. 1744: Livonia
      63. 1745: Moravia
      64. 1753: Kovad (Lithuania)
      65. 1761: Bordeaux
      66. 1772: Jews deported to the Pale of Settlement (Russia)
      67. 1775: Warsaw
      68. 1789: Alace
      69. 1804: Villages in Russia
      70. 1808: Villages & Countrysides (Russia)
      71. 1815: Lubeck & Bremen
      72. 1815: Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria
      73. 1820: Bremes
      74. 1843: Russian Border Austria & Prussia
      75. 1862: Area in the U.S. under Grant’s Jurisdiction
      76. 1866: Galatz, Romania
      77. 1919: Bavaria (foreign born Jews)
      78. 1938-45: Nazi Controlled Areas
      79. 1948: Arab Countries

    • “There is scarcely an event in modern history that cannot be traced to the Jews. Take the Great War (World War I)…the Jews have made this war!…We (Jews) who have posed as the saviours of the world…we Jews, today, are nothing else but the world’s seducers, its destroyer’s, its incendiaries, its executioners…We have finally succeeded in landing you into a new hell.” (Jewish Writer, Oscar Levy, The World Significance of the Russian Revolution; The International Jew, Vol. III (1921), pp. 184-87).

    • It’s the “I want to have medicare but other people shouldn’t have it” mentality

      You’re brainwashed enough to vote against your own interest because republicans have managed to portray it as bad if you help the people who need help, there’s just a mental disconnection that if other people don’t get help you don’t get help as well

    • Unfortunately, your grandparents were hit with the Ronald Reagan ray of stupidity that makes people give up government services that they need to survive.

    • collegeman1988 I don’t understand why people Chairish or put Ronald Ragan on a pedestal.. i’m sorry wasn’t an amazing president he was just average.. i’m not inspired by any of his words methodology or policy he was just a former celebrity.

    • +Kindell Armstrong You have to admit that some of what Reagan accomplished was admirable. I am not a Reagan fan by any means, yet his staunchness towards the USSR did help ring in the end of that communistic regime. You also have to give a bit of credit to the speech at the Berlin Wall. Other than those examples, I agree.

  4. If and when the Republicans cut Medicare and repeal Obamacare, the Democrats will have no other choice than to push for a single-payer system. Starting off at the state level, then at the Federal level.

    • +Mike Stavenes That makes zero sense as I am using a computer right now.  Tell me, has universal healthcare passed at the state level at all? 

    • +whyamimrpink78
      I was making a joke. I know, it’s hard to tell in text. 😉

      So, are you saying that Universal healthcare is a bad idea because people are too stupid to try it? Or are you just saying it’ll never happen, because people are too stupid to try it? It’s a slight distinction…but it’s noteworthy.

    • +whyamimrpink78, Vermont’s single-payer program was passed and signed by the Vermont governor. However, it was forestalled, cancelled, as it would cost a very small state with limited income a lot of money.

      Colorado’s single-payer failed to be approved by voters as the law was badly crafted to prohibit politicians to divert money and implement anti-choice measures. On top of this, there was a strong backlash from the insurance companies to downplay the law.

      All I’m saying is that once Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare are substantially cut/undermine. The Democrats will have no other choice than to push for single payer. Maybe in the end we’ll end up with a public insurance option?

      The strategy is always to start with Single-Payer so that the end compromise is a public insurance option to compete with the costly/wasteful private insurance companies.

    • In the end, some states may end up with a public insurance option if the traditional social programs (medicaid and medicare) are substantially cut/undermined. If the Federal government were to cut/undermine the aforementioned programs the costs would be redistributed to states, counties, cities, and individuals. Governments with less money will suffer. States like California and New York will manage well.

      California will prove to be strongly opposed (and vocal) to the Trump presidency as well as to the Republican Party. California perhaps ends up putting a public option initiative/proposition on the ballot? Maybe even a single payer initiative (California One Care) just to piss off the health insurance industry? This past election, CA couldn’t even approve a proposition (through the voters) for the state of CA to negotiate drug prices with Big Pharma. It was a 4-5% difference though. It is likely to pass 2-4 years from now though.

      If there’s any state in the Union that can manage a single payer system it is CA. It has the money to provide the service, the strong union + wealthy influence, a simple majority of voters are in favor of it, and so on. Time will tell…

    • The Laughing Man not my girl, I voted against her. Your girl rather, cause she is as establishment as your boy donald “let’s put Goldman Sachs in charge of government” Trump he appoint in office the same people that gave her 250k per speech. Deal with it my boy.

    • Nice reference (again…). What do you think the over/under line is on people who picked up on/understood it and/or have an idea who she is? At 84,587 views to this point, I would think even .1% (that’s 1/10th of 1% or 84 and 1/2 people, insert half person joke *here*) would be an optimistic guess. She’s even more exclusive than 1%ers, who will, undoubtedly, envy her for that and be pissed they can’t undo her murder so they could then kill someone more elite than them! LOL! (Both sad and funny because it’s true!). More importantly. however, is the amount who didn’t and then, reflexively, highlighted her name and executed an internet search to patch a hole in their knowledge of historical figures. That would be an interesting question to get the answer to, as well as telling of the true direction the country is heading…

    • Actually, premiums go up because the insurance company(‘s) in question decided it was time to raise the price for what they already offer or it was time they gave less for what they were charging. Mystery solved, next case…
      …and, yes, Bernie is #1!!!

Leave a Reply to Guillermo Rivas Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *